<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Control on mellowd.co.uk</title>
    <link>https://mellowd.co.uk/tags/control/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Control on mellowd.co.uk</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:28:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://mellowd.co.uk/tags/control/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>SPAN, RSPAN, Layer 2 control packets and VLANS</title>
      <link>https://mellowd.co.uk/post/span-rspan-layer-2-control-packets-and-vlans/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mellowd.co.uk/post/span-rspan-layer-2-control-packets-and-vlans/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I know the title is quite a mouthful, but I did want to cover all the above in this post. &lt;a href=&#34;http://lostintransit.se/&#34;&gt;Daniel&lt;/a&gt; asked me to check a few things as I have ready access to real switches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You learn in your studies that layer 2 control packets are ‘special’ – Special in the way that traffic going over the trunk between 2 switches does not follow the standard practice. Let’s use wireshark to see exactly what is going on in a bunch of scenarios. It’ll also give me the opportunity to do a bit of testing with SPAN and RSPAN.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
