<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>.Net on mellowd.co.uk</title>
    <link>https://mellowd.co.uk/tags/.net/</link>
    <description>Recent content in .Net on mellowd.co.uk</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://mellowd.co.uk/tags/.net/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>When and when not to multithread</title>
      <link>https://mellowd.co.uk/post/when-and-when-not-to-multithread/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mellowd.co.uk/post/when-and-when-not-to-multithread/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://mellowd.co.uk/ccie/?p=5807&#34;&gt;At the end of my last post on Python multithreading, I said my example was not the best.&lt;/a&gt; Let me expand some more on this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While testing code in the &lt;a href=&#34;https://mellowd.co.uk/ccie/?p=5807&#34;&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt;, I noticed that certain code was slower when multiple threads were running. Also these threads are not tied to a CPU. If we were talking about a bigger applications in which we wanted to ensure multiple threads were on different CPUs, &lt;a href=&#34;http://blog.programster.org/2014/12/14/python-multithreading-you-could-be-wasting-time/&#34;&gt;you are in fact looking for multiprocessing.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
